A Sourcebook for Reshaping the Community College: Curriculum Integration and the Multiple Domains of Career Preparation. Volume I: Framework and Examples
Over the past several years, community colleges and technical institutes have attempted to meet employers’ demands for graduates competent in the “new basic skills” required for organizational effectiveness by integrating academic and occupational education. But the variety of skills necessary for students to master and for community colleges to impart are different and much more comprehensive than either basic academic skills or conventional occupational courses convey. One purpose of this monograph, then, is to identify and describe areas or domains of competency that address the needs expressed by employers, the skills students need to progress through postsecondary education and the labor market itself, and the knowledge that educators have always wanted for their students.
These domains are as follows:
- Foundation academic competencies–reading, writing, calculation, and science competencies learned in the way in which they are applied in everyday practice
- Education for citizenship education–the economic, political, and social aspects of work
- Job specific/technical skills–the technical and production skills required for a particular occupation
- Career exploration–the match between self-knowledge and labor markets
- Systems utilization skills–understanding the big picture of how diverse personnel, time, capital, material, and facilities interact to shape an organization’s performance
- Generic technical skills–tools for designing and analyzing organizational systems, including software applications, recordkeeping procedures, interpretation of visual data representations, quality assurance techniques, and occupational and public safety standards
- Workplace organization experience–the commonalties between all other domains and an actual work setting
Although colleges have traditionally attempted to prepare
students for careers through general education, its distributed
structure of independent courses and prevalent lecture teaching
and assessment methods make it a weak approach to the
competencies we have identified. Innovative institutions have
devised other ways of incorporating these domains into their
curriculum, including infusing foundation skills and work-related
applications into existing courses; blending academic content
with career perspectives in hybrid courses; linking academic and
occupational courses and perhaps work-based learning into a
cluster or learning community of students and faculty; authentic
forms of assessment by which students demonstrate a variety of
communication, mathematical, technical, and systems utilization
competencies; and work-based learning which allow students to
connect the knowledge learned in school to actual practice.
With the exception of the job specific domain, some version of
which every college has in place, we found that colleges are most
likely to adapt courses in reading, composition, math, and
science to the career preparation needs of students. To
incorporate career preparation into transfer level courses,
colleges have experimented with writing-intensive occupational
courses, as well as hybrid courses which apply ethical or career-
related themes to literature and composition, and clusters of
courses connected by an occupational or technology theme.
Sections of courses “especially appropriate for” career clusters
maintain traditional outcomes and academic rigor, at the same
time they incorporate texts, learning activities, and student
assessments related to usage in everyday practice. Two approaches
are predominant at the Associate degree level: infusion of
work-related applications into academic courses and of reading,
writing, and math skills into occupational courses; and “applied
academics,” which are either occupational courses with an
academic bent (Pharmaceutical Math, Police Science Report
Writing) or academic courses with an occupational focus (Business
English, Technical Physics). In addition, a few colleges have
taken advantage of natural overlaps between concepts and their
practical uses to link courses (i.e., medical terminology and
anatomy and physiology). At the developmental level, learning
communities in which a cohort of students concurrently enroll in
a cluster of occupational and academic courses with language
support offer access to career preparation for individuals whose
low basic skills block their way to economic advancement.
Generic technical skills tend to be offered as stand alone
computer or quality management courses, rather than their more
powerful use as tools to complete serious work-like simulations
or culminating projects. Capstone courses or projects
demonstrating a student’s ability to plan, execute, and present a
work-like product encompassing all aspects of a production or
service system are valuable instruments for communicating to
students themselves and to potential employers what they know and
are able to do.
Career exploration is the least frequent domain formally
addressed by community colleges, a particularly worrisome finding
since many students use the college to experiment with the
options available to them, “milling around” in unfocused courses
of study until they find an area of interest that matches their
personal attributes. Colleges have been slow to publish
retention, graduation, and placement outcomes for each course of
study so that students can understand the employment outcomes
they might expect from a certificate or degree; we found only one
college which did so.
Although new federal reforms such as the School to Work
Opportunities Act recommend that programs incorporate both
school- and work-based learning, few colleges require or even
offer internships or cooperative education for technical
students; almost none offer work-based education for liberal arts
majors; and only one college in this survey had a well-developed
mechanism for connecting the two forms of learning. Connecting
activities or seminars are critical for helping individuals see
themselves as students in both settings–in the classroom and in
the workplace–beginning a valuable foundation for life-long
learning.
Education for citizenship separates “job training” from
“education,” and we have seen numerous examples of innovations
which demonstrate that adapting liberal arts courses to the
career interests of students need not reduce their rigor or the
integrity of their content–career preparation and citizenship
education need not be independent of one another. Innovative
colleges have integrated the knowledge of political, economic,
and cultural dimensions of our society with work-related
perspectives, helping students find connections between career
preparation and the humanities and social science component of
the general education sequence. For students pursuing career
goals, adapted social science and humanities courses are
especially promising, since occupational students often postpone
or avoid these general education requirements, precluding them
from degree completion.
This monograph describes, and the accompanying volume provides
examples of, exemplary programs that avoid the separation between
theory and the practice of a variety of competencies on a variety
of scales. In addition, we outline implementation strategies that
colleges have found successful for workforce development reform,
which call for participation and support from both administrators
and faculty–a top-down design pattern coupled with bottom-up
authority to plan and execute reforms. Every college described
barriers and uncertainty in the process of devising innovative
programs. However, the potential benefits are enormous because
the results would be two-year colleges that can provide their
students, and the employers for whom they will work, the full
range of competencies required for the modern world.
Badway, N., & Grubb, W. N. (1997, October). A sourcebook for reshaping the community college: Curriculum integration and the multiple domains of career preparation. Volume I: Framework and examples. Berkeley, CA: National Center for Research in Vocational Education.